2.1.2 Hydrocarbon fields

Depleted or depleting hydrocarbon fields usually have a long production record and come with a great deal of knowledge about their geometry and reservoir properties. These are proven storage sites because the hydrocarbon fields are traps by definition. It is difficult to define criteria for the usability of depleted gas fields for CO2 geological storage - certainly bigger fields are better suited for this purpose, but an economic scenario together with CO2 availability are also required. The issue of enhanced hydrocarbon recovery is clearer, especially in the case of CO2-EOR (Vangkilde-Pedersen et al., 2008) where miscible flood (Fig. 2-3), ensuring a high (additional) recovery, is preferred.

E.Fig 2-3

Fig. 2-3: CO2-EOR miscible flood process (Green and Willhite, 1998).

Tab. 2-2 presents the most commonly applied CO2-EOR criteria (after Taber et al., 1997). Conditions for miscible flood (mixture of oil and CO2 appears close to the injection front causing a relative high pressure build-up in surroundings) are defined for a wide range of oil types and reservoirs, with the exception of heavy oils, for which immiscible flood applies. In the case of heavy oils, the CO2-EOR mechanism is the buoyancy force, not unlike as in the saline aquifers; however, this is less effective and less profitable than the miscible flood.

Tab. 2-2: CO2 Flooding (Enhanced Oil Recovery) criteria proposed by Taber et al., 1997.

Criterion/ Mechanism

Oil gravity

[API]

(current projects)

Depth

Composition

Viscosity

[cP] (current projects)

Oil saturation

[% PV] (current projects)

Reservoir formation

Average permeability

Miscible flood

>40

32 - 39.9

28 - 31.9

22 - 27.9

(27 - 44)

>830 m

>930 m

>1100 m

> 1330 m

High percentage of intermediate hydrocarbons (especially C5 - C12)

<10

(0.3 - 6)

>20

(15 - 70)

Sandstones or carbonates; relatively thin unless dipping

Sufficient injection rates maintained

Immiscible flood

13-22

>600 m