2.3.2 Storage in onshore aquifers

Storage in onshore aquifers offers a large potential and might be the only choice for inland areas (one example from central Poland, about 400 km from Baltic coast is shown in Fig. 2-9). This is, however, a sensitive issue because of high population density in and around areas where large industrial CO2 emission sources are present (Vangkilde-Pedersen, 2008) and public opposition may not be uncommon.

Safety issues need to be addressed during the site selection phase, otherwise the whole selection process may need to be revised. In general, the provisions of the 2009/31/EC Directive on geological storage of carbon dioxide, in particular Annex 1 to the Directive, can be applied as the first step based on available data.

E. Fig . 2-9

Fig. 2-9: Storage options for the Bełchatów CCS demo project in central Poland (Polish National Programme on Safe CO2 Storage: http://skladowanie.pgi.gov.pl).

A preliminary model of the storage site is then constructed; possible hazards are identified; exposures and effects on humans and the environment (e.g. groundwater resources) are assessed; the Risks are evaluated together with sensitivity assessment (importance of particular parameters of the model - Tab. 2-7); and finally possible risks to health, safety and environment are summarised.

Tab. 2-7: Parameters important for evaluation of storage safety in onshore saline aquifers (after Chadwick et al., 2006).

Parameter

Depth (of the reservoir)

Caprock thickness

Caprock quality and integrity

Capillary entry pressure

Closure

Salinity

Description

CO2 in supercritical phase (depth and pressure correlate well, temperature depends on local geothermal gradient)

Primary at least of 20 m, recommended over 100 m and/or other caprock complexes above

Low permeability, high capillary entry pressure, rather no faulting and lateral facies' changes within the caprock complex

Much higher than buoyancy force of the column of CO2 injected (injection simulations assess the safe amount of CO2)

Anticline height sufficient the plume will not exceed the spill point (injection simulations necessary in order to assess safe amount)

Over 30 g/l guarantees no exchange of brine with potable water occurs in the reservoir; if less porewater analyses necessary