5.3 Case studies and need for geomechanical coupled simulations

It is a priori necessary to predict that a potential storage site has a good sealing capacity, so that the injected CO2 would be safely contained. The caprock and exiting wells are the main types of potential weak points in a storage system. An accurate assessment of storage performance may require the modelling of coupled processes: multiphase flow, kinetically-controlled geochemical reactions and geomechanical deformation. For example, porosity/permeability of the reservoir rock may be altered due to concomitant mineral precipitation/dissolution and fracture-aperture evolution (Johnson, 2009). This interplay of geochemical and geomechanical processes, within both the reservoir and, most importantly, the caprock, can strongly influence storage containment, capacity and the CO2 plume distribution.

A series of dynamic flow simulation and geomechanical analysis models that are consistent with the geological model should be built to predict the impacts of the planned storage operation. These models will usually only represent a sub-set of the domain for the geological model where CO2 is expected to migrate, or geomechanical responses to any pressure increase which may occur (Aarnes et al., 2010). The model will allow prediction of flow of CO2 from the injection well(s) into the storage formation for the duration of injection operations, and the long-term evolution of the CO2 plume after the cessation of injection. The dynamic model should give quantified estimates of CO2 volume, concentration and spatial distribution at an appropriate temporal resolution. In particular, the coupled geomechanical and flow simulations should be planned and executed to assess leakage probabilities and rates relative to key risks, such as:

  • CO2 entry into the caprock (e.g. due to pressure in excess of capillary entry pressure of the caprock or due to caprock degradation);

  • leakage through inadequately sealed wells;

  • upward flux of CO2 or formation fluids in fracture and fault zones.

Coupled flow and geomechanical modelling studies increase our understanding as discussed in the following sections.

 

in depth

5.3.1 Large-scale geomechanical modelling

Rutqvist et al. (2008) modelled multi-layer systems using a coupling between TOUGH2 and FLAC3D. ...

5.3.2 Surface uplift

COmerlati et al., (2006) investigated the potential of CO2 injection below the Venice Lagoon using available geological,...

5.3.3 Pressure response

The effects of the underlying and overlying mud rocks on the reservoir pressure during CO2 injection based on rock and f...

5.3.4 Fault re-activation and/or shear failure

Shi and Durucan (2009) assessed the potential for shear failure and/or re-activation of pre-existing faults because of c...

5.3.5 Reactive transport

The intense flushing of the reservoir rock around CO2 injectors with large quantities of dried super critical CO2 can ca...

5.3.6 Storage Capacity Estimation

The simplest method for estimating storage capacity is the volumetric method. ...

5.3.7 EOR Operations

When CO2 is stored as a component of EOR projects, the initial depletion of the reservoir, and all the influences associ...

5.3.8 Leakage risk through a fault

Chang et al. (2008) developed a quasi-1D single phase flow model to examine the CO2 upward migration along a fault, CO2 ...