5.1 Site remediation measures

Remediation measures (often also called corrective measures) are applied in case a significant irregularity in the behaviour of a storage site or a leakage of CO2 from a storage site occurs. The method and type of remediation required will be dictated by the nature of the significant irregularity or leakage. The main generic leakage pathways and irregular behaviour types can be summarised as follows (Guidance Documents 1and 2, EC, 2011a, b):

  • Geological

    • CO2 leakage due to caprock failure - caprocks may be ineffective in containing CO2, unexpectedly absent over part of the storage area, or degraded as a result of geochemical reactions and/or hydrocarbon depletion;
    • CO2 leakage via faults and fractures - leakage through natural geological pathways, or resulting from CO2 injection and build up in the reservoir, hydrocarbon depletion, natural or induced seismic activity;
    • Overfilling beyond spill point - structural spill out of the trap, where the reservoir is smaller than expected and/or over-filled;
    • Updip leakage - leakage through high permeability intervals, of particular relevance to stratigraphic trapping or migration assisted storage.
  • Manmade

    • CO2 leakage through wells and boreholes - caused by well integrity issues;
    • Pathways associated with mining activity.
  • Other

    • Risks relating to groundwater including effects that arise directly from the effect of dissolved CO2 in the formation water, including heavy metal mobilisation;
    • Indirect effects from groundwater contamination by displaced brine;
    • Oil or gas leakage or emissions that could result from the displacement of hydrocarbons in underground formations by CO2 injection and movement;
    • Any risks relating to movement of other hazardous components such as H2S;
    • Ground movement, uplift and/or subsidence;
    • Natural seismicity, seismic hazards and tectonics, including exposure earthquakes;
    • Effects from sabotage or terrorism.

A significant distinction needs to be made between remediation measures that can be applied to the two major types of leakage pathways - geological and manmade. While corrective measures and repairs to wells (most frequent manmade pathways) are often technically feasible, the effectiveness of corrective measures and potential of restoring the geological system in general is limited. However, corrective measures that involve early interventions and modifications to injection operations will usually be beneficial (Guidance Document 2, EC, 2011b).

In principle, wells can be accessed, allowing tools to be run or operations to be performed in order to repair leakages or significant irregularities of the wellbore and its immediate surroundings. Unlike wells where the location of any anomaly is usually known and pinpointed, geological anomalies are more likely to be three-dimensional problems, of significant vertical and/or lateral extent, and where the precise location of any failure points is uncertain. In addition flaws in the geological system can typically be corrected only when wells are penetrating the affected zone. This seriously reduces the options to repair the geological anomalies, making early detection through monitoring and early intervention important. Hence, it is important to carefully integrate the monitoring plans and activities with the corrective measures. Monitoring should be used to detect anomalies and trigger early mitigation measures.

 

in depth

5.1.1 Remediation of leakage through wells by well intervention

CO2 leakage from the storage reservoir through operating and especially orphaned, abandoned and even old wells is consid...

5.1.2 Remediation of leakage through geological pathways

In case a leakage occurs as a result of an unexpected flaw in the geological system, this is most likely to result from ...

5.1.3 Remediation of leakage into overlying aquifers

Leakage of CO2 into groundwater aquifers may degrade valuable groundwater resources, including drinking water reserves, ...