5.1.2 Remediation of leakage through geological pathways

In case a leakage occurs as a result of an unexpected flaw in the geological system, this is most likely to result from caprock failure, faults and fracturing, overfilling the storage reservoir beyond spill point or up-dip leakage. Due to the limited access to the geological structures at depth, the possibilities to correct or repair the containment capacity of the system are usually restricted to a general set of measures associated with wells and injection operations management (Guidance Document 2, EC, 2011b). Remediation measures can be deployed either to reduce or prevent further leakage or to try to correct and remediate the leakage itself, and any impacts at surface.

There are several viable techniques based on stopping the pressure increase in all or part of the reservoir, or reducing the pressure. The main techniques are (Guidance Document 2, EC, 2011b):

  • Limiting CO2 injection rates and pressure build-up in specific wells or across the site, either temporarily or permanently. This would reduce pressure build-up in all or part of the reservoir and may be used to address caprock related issues and fracturing. This type of measure is straightforward to apply.

  • Reducing the reservoir pressure by extracting CO2 or water from the storage reservoir or complex. By decreasing the pressure gradient this may help cease or reverse the impacts of faulting, fractures, spill and any migration out of the storage complex. This can be done in a number of ways:

    • Reduction of CO2 injection pressure (e.g. by using lower injection rate, or more injection wells);
    • Stopping CO2 injection;
    • Producing back injected CO2 from the storage reservoir/plume (actively reducing reservoir pressure) and either controlled venting or re-injection in another site;
    • Peripheral extraction of formation water or other fluids;
    • Increase of reservoir capacity and steering CO2 in favourable directions by hydrofracturing (this would create pathways to develop and access new compartments of the storage reservoir away from leakage areas; by expanding the storage container, the pressure will decrease).
  • Extraction of CO2 at or near an identified leakage point, zone or pathway (in contrast to extraction from storage reservoir). This will depend on pinpointing leakage zones and is likely to require new targeted extraction wells. In some cases it may be possible to intersect leakage zones with existing wells by:

  • Sealing regions where leakage is occurring such as identified fault or caprock leakage pathways in limited areas by injecting low-permeability materials (e.g. foam or grout).

  • Increase of pressure in formations upstream of CO2 leakage, creating a hydraulic barrier (decreasing pressure gradient).

One should be aware of the status and limitations of different techniques and methods. While several of these measures involve commonly employed practices in oil and gas industry or environmental remediation, some comprise innovative concepts or include expensive operations such as drilling of new wells. The natural geological system contains many heterogeneities and discontinuities. As a result, leakage is not easily undone, so that choices to repair are limited and rather tend to be directed at mitigation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of all the measures is strongly determined by the site-specific geological system, the nature of the actual leakage or irregularity and the status of the specific method or technique (Guidance Document 2, EC, 2011b).