4.2 Definition of monitoring objectives and intensity

According to the EU CCS Directive, the main objectives/purposes of monitoring are to: i) assess whether the injected CO2, including CO2 plume, is behaving as expected, ii) identify if any migration, leakage or significant irregularities occur and iii) assess whether any identified leakage is damaging the environment or human health.

Three categories of monitoring can be identified according to the Guidance Document 2 (2011):

  • Mandatory monitoring (for all sites). This includes the parameters (injection rate, pressure, temperature, gas composition) described in Section 3.2.2 that are important for the operational monitoring. These parameters are typically measured by downhole instrumentation or at the well head and are required to be monitored continuously or intermittent during the injection phase. Downhole pressure and temperature measurements as well as measurements at the well head are also recommended during the post injection period.
  • Required (site-specific) monitoring. The objective of this monitoring is to demonstrate the integrity of the seal, fault and wells at the specific site. This monitoring will be closely linked with the site-specific risk. To assess fault integrity repeated 3D seismic surveys and pressure interference can be employed. The operator is required to perform monitoring with a frequency that gives sufficient input to dynamic modelling. The optimal schedule for seismic surveys is site-specific and depends on the model parameters, dominant trapping mechanism, target depth, caprock and overburden etc. The well integrity (annular pressure, wireline logging, optical well logging, cement bond logging, soil gas measurements) needs to be measured in the order of months during the injection phase.
  • Optional contingency monitoring (site-specific). The third category refers to a contingency monitoring system which will be used in the event of irregularities. Contingency monitoring needs to be considered and planned for at an early stage in the project and should be based on the site-specific risk analysis. For example, microseismic monitoring (geophones behind casing of a well) can be a useful method for contingency monitoring during the injection phase.

Different phases of the project require different frequency of monitoring (cf. Chapter 1). The monitoring frequency during baseline survey and baseline data collection in the pre-injection phase will typically be same as or higher than during the operational phase. In the event of an irregularity, higher frequencies of monitoring and possibly additional monitoring tools will be required.