1.3.1 Health, safety and environmental (HSE) monitoring

Negative effects on human health, plant or animal life are at risk, if concentrations of hazardous substances (see 1.3.4) exceed critical concentrations. Thus, detection and monitoring of concentrations in or surrounding protected subjects (see 1.1.2) is the main task of hse monitoring.

The impact magnitude of an incident is primarily related to the leakage rate, but subject to further factors:

flux density ⇒ concentration and concentration, vulnerability and value of subject Þ impact

Concentrations resulting from a leakage flux (mass flux per time) depend on the volume of the affected subject and on the intensity of mixing within this volume. Hazardous concentrations may accumulate, if mixing, dispersion or turbulence are low, if chemical reaction rates are fast or if sufficient time for accumulation is available, e.g.

  1. CO2 pipeline failure on a calm day in a lowland valley:
    large flux
    large affected volume ⇒ high concentrations ⇒ potential of high impact on life close little mixing to the ground
  2. CO2 flux into a non-ventilated, rarely used cellar:

    small flux rate
    small volume ⇒ high concentrations ⇒ localised potentially lethal impact little mixing long accumulation time

Within one protected subject, e.g. an ecosystem, the vulnerability of various species may differ significantly. For human safety, detailed relations between concentration, duration of exposure and effects caused by CO2 have been established (Tab. 1-2). Human health can be at risk in enclosed environments (cellars, caves etc.) or topographical depressions, where CO2 may accumulate because CO2 is denser than air (1.98 vs. 1.2 kg m-3, respectively) and tends to build up on ground levels.

For other species more general, critical concentration thresholds have been published (e.g. Blackshaw et al., 1988; Zaller and Arnone, 1999; Loranger et al., 2004; Asshoff, 2005; Leach et al., 2002; Niel and Weary, 2006). The impact of substances depends also on the environment. For example, saline formation water leaking into the sea may be less dramatic than a comparable saltwater leakage into a freshwater environment. In addition, the value of the protected good matters: An acre of trees dying in a large plantation (subject to individual property rights) may not be as valuable, as an acre of the same tree species, being unique in a wider region.

The examples demonstrate that the classification of impacts in a risk process cannot be directly linked to flux rates calculated for leakage scenarios in subsurface numerical models. Site-specific features have to be included into the assessment.

Tab. 1-2: CO2 thresholds and effects regarding human health. Compiled from safety data sheets "carbon dioxide" of the companies Knauber Gas (Bonn, 2007), Linde (Höllriegelskreuth, 2010), Praxair Tech. (Danbury, 2007) and Air Liquide Germany (Düsseldorf, 2010).

Air CO2 conc.
(% vol.)

Increase against
ambient air value

CO2 thresholds and effects

0.039

---

Global average concentration in ambient air in 2010 (WMO, 2011)

0.15

3.9-fold

Hygienically recommended value for indoors fresh air

0.3

7.7-fold

MIC value (= maximum indoor concentration),
no health concerns to long term exposure below this value

0.5

12.8-fold

MAC value (= maximum allowable concentration at workplaces)

1.5

38.5-fold

Breathing rate increases to 40% above the normal level

4

103-fold

Normal concentration of exhaled air. Weak narcotic effects, impaired hearing, headache, increased blood pressure and pulse rate

5

128-fold

Breathing increases to approximately four times the normal rate, symptoms of intoxication become evident, vertigos, slight feeling of choking

8 - 10

205- to 256-fold

Very laboured breathing, headache, visual impairment, ringing in the ears, sick, judgment may be impaired, loss of consciousness, exposure of 30-60 minutes leads to death

>10

> 256-fold

Unconsciousness occurs more rapidly; prolonged exposure may result in death from asphyxiation